Political economy, production layers, monetary architecture, and the cost of coercion.
The real fight over AI is not capability — it is ownership. Who owns the models, who captures the margin, and who gets residual participation determines whether AI amplifies concentration or distributes power.
AI does not replace the job. AI eats tasks. The relevant question is no longer Will there still be work? The relevant question is: Who owns the machines, the intelligence, the compute, the robots; and who waits in line for alms?
Part II of The Machinery of Exit: same hardware, two futures — managed dependency or sovereign production.
A cost-structure argument for why sovereignty accelerates when neuromorphic robotics underbids human labor overhead.
Virgil dispatch from the trench: the old obedience economy is degrading as production exits wage-gate institutions.
A comprehensive breakdown of why Libertaria doesn't need 'do not steal' as an Axiom — the existing ten Axioms already compose into comprehensive theft protection through physics, not prohibition.
Exit is always cheap; history is always preserved
The submarine survives without payload; the payload makes the submarine attractive
The complete specification for the L0-L3 sovereign shell architecture
The end of differentiation. The advertising temptation. The cost spiral. And the question of who will define the native unit of account for the AI economy.